He hid a ridiculous instruction in white text. Forty students handed in the answer it produced.
Roberto Serrano, an economics professor at Brown University, described in Nature on 10 August how he found evidence of widespread AI use on a midterm in his course on welfare economics and social choice theory. He had set the test as a take-home for the first time in nearly two decades of teaching it, because some students were reluctant to return to the classroom after a shooting on campus earlier in the year. Inside one essay question he buried an absurd instruction in white font — invisible on the page, but copied along with the question if a student pasted it into a chatbot, which duly obeyed it. The grades came back with an average of 96, against averages in the 60s to 80s in previous years, and 40 students scoring full marks. Serrano's argument in Nature is that detection software is not the answer and that universities have to change what they ask for: assessment that watches a student think, rather than assessment that collects a finished document.
Related stories
For two years schools tried to keep chatbots out. Now they are handing them to pupils and asking them to catch the mistakes.2026-08-21Two school years, 18 schools, one AI tutor: the gain was about what practising without it produces
2026-08-20A university system pointed a model at 14,000 syllabuses and asked it to find the forbidden topics
2026-08-19ChatGPT now guesses whether it is talking to a child — and if it decides yes, the product changes around them
2026-08-18Mexico's largest university is making tens of thousands sit its entrance exam again — in a room, on paper, with nothing in their pockets
2026-08-17